Does that mean the billionaire oilman is planning to open one of his free Examiners in Los Angeles? Not necessarily. Anschutz has substantial holdings in L.A. and certainly a lot of ad agencies work out of that city, so perhaps basing a national sales manager there makes sense. Then again, Los Angeles was one of the 70 cities where Clarity registered the name Examiner in 2005.
Oddly enough, Hearst Corp. had an afternoon paper in Los Angeles called the Examiner that closed in 1989 -- so an Anschutz L.A. Examiner would have instant name recognition. Moreover, it would give Anschutz (seen here in sunglasses) a chance to influence the entertainment media, particularly the movie industry. He has been trying to do that for years by backing family-friendly movies such as "Ray," a profile of musician Ray Charles. Currently Anschutz is embroiled in an ugly lawsuit with author Clive Cussler over who is to blame for the movie flop "Sahara."Covering L.A. with free newspapers would be an expensive undertaking because of the city's size — a sprawling 469 square miles. And Anschutz's people tend to favor the "commuter daily" format that is popular in places with a heavy amount of mass transit, such as Europe, New York, Boston, Philadelphia and Washington. Los Angeles, on the other hand, is a city devoted to its cars. Getting motorists out of their cars so that they pick up an Examiner would prove to be a challenge.
It may also be that Anschutz is unwilling to open more newspapers until the existing ones make money. Remember all the talk two years ago about how Anschutz planned to open dailies in cities across the country? Anschutz hasn't opened a paper in a new city since April 2006 when the Baltimore Examiner hit the streets, bringing Clarity Media's momentum to a grinding halt. Even though Anschutz is a billionaire, he probably doesn't like to lose money more than anyone else.